Functional Decomposition And Morphological Matrix

The aim of such contribution 73 is not to modify the logic of functional decomposition and morphology, but only to indicate most suitable TRIZ tools for enhancing each of the main, generally valid, conceptual design phases. Most of the tools were selected from the classical TRIZ base of knowledge, while others were selected from some new

functional decomposition Overall function Sub-function A n a l y s i s S y n t h e s i s P 21 P 11 Morphological analysis does not originate from the discipline of design the matrix representation is able to display an infinite number of dimensions Figure 2 right, b. Vol. 3, No. 2 Heller et al. Rethinking Morphological Analysis

Your team developed an expansive list of design solution concepts for basic product functions identified using function treesfunctional decomposition and morphology. Next steps. Use House of Quality QFD with Decision Matrix to guide, justify, and document your decision in final concept selection

2.PSL Functional Analysis M This section describes the MPSL process as a set of subfunctions and performance parameters, which are shown through a functional decomposition and a morphological matrix. 2.1 MPSL System Subfunctions The MPSL process can be discretized into a set of functional subsystems, each with their

Fiorineschi completed a literature review of 'functional decomposition and morphology FDM', AD and the design structure matrix DSM 45. Most functional decomposition methods have focused more on the subjective judgment of the designer, the reasoning process of functional decomposition is usually based on established knowledge.

The Morphological Matrix is a well-known and established method for synthesising concepts in engineering design. With the aim to improve its applicability, the method has been To perform a functional decomposition the primary function of the potential product is divided into subfunctions SFs that needs to be performed to fulfil the primary

Functional decomposition and morphology FDM have become the most common functional design method in conceptual design models 31. A framework based on a parameter analysis methodology and

The functional modules and the sub-system concepts obtained through the options matrices are combined using a modified morphological matrix Level 1 morphological matrix as illustrated in Fig. 3. Functional module pairs are extracted from the level 1 morphological matrix using a similar process as explained in Step 2.

The functional decomposition cross-functional relationship matrix, Table 2, shows how each functional system of the device relates to one another. The four main sub-systems are labeled in the columns of the matrix and the sixteen functions are along the rows of the left side of the matrix. Each 'X' indicates if the sub-system functions

proach to functional decomposition as described rst by Pahl and Beitz 6. Of these 11 that describe it, only four mention addi-tional methods. Therefore the black-box method is by far the morphology matrix 22, which depends on having a list of func-tions prior to the creation of the chart. The function-means tree