Indigenous Logic Model

DEFINING DESIRED OUTCOMES USING LOGIC MODELS A logic model is a planning tool used to chart a path towards an overarching goal. Developing a logic model will help you define the outcomes you are trying to measure. Once you know the outcomes you are trying to measure, you can design the indicators that will be used to measure each outcome. Logic

challenge model, and emphasize instead the importance of Indigenous leadership and collaboration with and among communities. They aim to bring forward ideas inspired by Indigenous knowledge, regardless of their stage of development, while finding pathways to develop these into sustainable solutions that can have

Initially, when asked whether the logic model, which represented all of the program elements specified in official descriptions of the Title VI program, accurately reflects the program as they experience it, some Indigenous stakeholders observed that the construct of spirituality and spiritual well-being was not explicitly represented . In

The visual Logic Model can be viewed full size as a JPG here and a PDF here. The intention of the curricula in this portal is that learners and participants will experience the following outcomes Indigenous logic model. With the intention of centering Indigenous culture at all levels of our work, including evaluation, our team created a

Indigenous Evaluation Tools. Indigenous Evaluation Framework Telling Our Story in Our Place and Time LaFrance amp Nichols, 2009 Indigenous Approaches to Evaluation Cauchie, n.d. General Evaluation Resources. Developing a Logic Model to Guide Evaluation SAMHSA's Center for the Application of Prevention Technologies

living e.g. Indigenous peoples tend to think about well -being comprehensively by assessing our interaction and l iving off the land with non-human relatives such as plants, animals, water, and air Burnette, Clark, amp Rodning, 2018. Indigenous peoples have different experiences and origin stories related to evaluation.

Indigenous philosophies provide alternatives to the colonial, masculinist tendencies of classical logic in the form of paraconsistentmany-valuedlogics. Specifically, when Indigenous logics embrace the possibility of true contradictions, they highlight aspects of the world rejected and ignored by classical logic and inspire a relational

development of the Program Logic Model, which is described in the next section. The third evaluation activity is Assessing Program Process, where we look at day-to-day program delivery and management, measure client satisfaction, develop a client profile, and see if the program has reached the target population Rossi et al., 2004.

The AIPHRC staff applied core components of a logic model i.e., inputs, activities, outcomes, outputs, and impact to an Indigenous evaluation framework. The first step to the AIPHRC's reverse-logic modelling process, inspired by Technology of Participation ToP, 2023 facilitation methods, included working with the Tribal program staff to

A Yup'ik Cultural Logic Model of Contexts. The first step in the Qasgiq Model provides a historical context situating the subsequent steps in a schema of cultural continuity and change. This historicizing process step is a defining characteristic in an Indigenous Yup'ik logic model. Typically, in Western-based logic models, the process