Sif Decision Making Tree Csra Diagram
3 workers. It does provide insight into the severity of injuries and their impact on a worker's ability to work. See www.OSHA.gov pSIF potential SIFs - Incidents that have the potential to have resulted in a serious injury or fatality due to the pre-cursors or sources of energy involved e.g. Work at heights, electrical ,
The fourth question is all about decision logic. Using a SIF decision tree makes several aspects of answering this question easier. It will build alignment around what has SIF potential and what does not have SIF potential, reducing circular discussions about whether an event is a potential SIF SIFp or not. Read more about SIF potential here.
This decision tree provides a user-friendly way to assess events for SIF exposures, enabling you to determine SIF events and their severity levelsbe it mitigated, actual, or potential. With this resource, you'll be better equipped to make more consistently informed decisions, that ultimately allow you to focus on the workplace exposures that
EEI SIF Critera. Quality of Safety Leading Indicators Leadership Engageme nt Field Guide. Quality of Safety Leading Indicators Leadership Engageme nt Scorecard Worker Perspective CSRA is a partnership with University of Colorado Boulder 2025 by The Construction Safety Research Alliance
Unique Precursors of SIF. Are the causes of high and low severity injuries different? Although this has emerged as popular opinion, it has not been objectively studied. We will tackle this fundamental question by creating a scientific definition of 'serious' injury and exploring how severity can be graded. CSRA is a partnership with
SIF Serious Injury or Fatality Incident Determination and Reporting Guidelines 9 Accidents, injuries, and near-miss events are diverse and sometimes won't fit perfectly into this decision tree format. Thankfully, the last question leaves room for that. Always review the facts of the incident carefully when determining SIF potential.
SIF Potential Back Struck byCaught Between Objects Did the employee sustain a life threatening, life altering or life ending injury? No Was the energy source of the object Mechanical, Hydraulic, Rolling Equipment, or Storedtrapped Energy? Overview Click to View Yes Did or could the event result in a SIF injury? Yes Was the exposure
The only real difference between an quotactual SIFquot and a quotpotential SIFquot in inches, seconds, and luck. Each should receive the same treatment. Each should receive the same treatment. Apply this decision logic while conducting a longitudinal analysis of a representative sample of recordable injuries and near-misses.
6-Steps in the SIF Model There are 6 Steps we will work through in implementing the Plan-Do-Check-Act sections of the model Step 1 Assess existing organizational capacity for SIF prevention and preparing organization for SIF prevention work Step 2 Conduct initial hazard identification and determine the risk
decision tree, based on an organization's SIF exposure incident history, is developed and used to drive SIF exposure classification of all incidents, and facilitates decisions based on the objective criteria of the decision logic, ensuri ng consistency. 5.1.3. For each SIF exposure event, further analysis i.e., SIF precursor